Revan Analytics by DataMaaS

Ask Revan.

The analyst that provides answers you can defend.

The analyst works out what’s true; the strategist tells you what to do about it.

The shape of every answer

  • The callThe answer, in the first line.
  • The evidenceEvery figure tied to its source.
  • The caveatWhat the data can’t tell you yet.
  • The next stepThe check worth doing first.
  • Your governed data
  • Read-only
  • Entitlements enforced
  • Never used to train AI

What Revan is

You already have the data. The problem is the answer.

Today’s AI is built to sound right, not to be right. It hands you a confident number, a clean narrative, and no way to tell which parts it invented.

The exposure isn’t usually the data. It’s the time between the question and an answer you’d actually put your name to.

Revan runs on Claude. What closes that gap isn’t a smarter model — it’s the operating system around it: your governed data, your definitions, your entitlements, and the ten fixed angles every answer is tested from before it reaches you.

Built first for manufacturing and managed service providers. Four ERP systems in four countries and four currencies, aligned to one consolidated currency — or a single system, a data warehouse, or a lake.

01

The analyst

Reads every relevant source, establishes which basis the question needs, and ties each figure to where it came from — before it says a word about what to do.

02

The strategist

Then tells you what the number means and what to do about it: the call first, the support behind it, and the next step you can actually take.

Two jobs. One system. Neither one useful without the other.

The standard

Five things it will always do.

Standing commitments — the reason a Revan answer holds up when a board, a lender, or an auditor starts asking questions.

Including the commitment to tell you when it isn’t sure. That’s the part generic AI leaves out.

  • 01
    Give you a number you can defendEvery figure traced to its source, on a stated basis. When someone challenges it, the evidence is already there.
  • 02
    Tell you what won’t survive scrutiny — firstI stress-test my own conclusion from the angles most likely to break it, then tell you plainly what the evidence cannot yet prove.
  • 03
    Refuse to flatter a bad planIf your premise doesn’t hold, you hear it — with the evidence attached. Agreeable analysis is worth nothing.
  • 04
    Lead with the decision, not the dataThe call and the “so what” come first. Read one line and act; read the rest only if you want to.
  • 05
    Leave the gap rather than fill itNo figure, name, or cause that no source supports. Where I’m inferring rather than reporting, I say so in the answer.

Where those numbers come from, and who can see them

Go deeper

Two questions people ask next.

Both are open — no account needed to read them.

Get started

Put Revan on a real decision.

Bring a live question, or point it at your own numbers. One working session will tell you more than this page can.

Already a DataMaaS customer? Your governed data layer may already exist. New to us? Start on a demo layer, or a spreadsheet of your own.